Pull your name, your Google results, and your LinkedIn, Instagram, and website copy. The checklist below makes it quick.
The Sniff Test. What a referred prospect finds.
Before a referred prospect ever calls, they look you up. This is what they find, and whether it earns the call.
Test
Three steps. About ten minutes.
Paste the prompt, drop in your surfaces, and run it. It reads your presence and scores it right in the chat.
A scored audit, the single highest leverage fix, a branded report you can download, and a plain black and white version for printing.
You are looked up before you are hired.
Trust is the whole game, and most of it gets decided before you are ever in the room. Think about your own behavior. When was the last time someone recommended something that actually mattered, a doctor, a contractor, an advisor, and you didn't go look them up first? You did. Everyone does. That search is the real interview.
A referral gets you in the door. It does not close anyone. You were referred for a reason, usually some version of your value proposition. The prospect takes that reason and quietly verifies it across everywhere you show up. If what they find confirms it, trust compounds. If what they find is generic, contradictory, or absent, the referral leaks out the bottom and you never know it happened.
The higher up market you go, the more this matters. Bigger clients do more diligence, not less, and they are far more sensitive to a presence that doesn't match the introduction.
Four surfaces. One verdict.
It doesn't happen on a single page. It happens across four surfaces, in about four minutes, and the prospect blends them into one feeling. Most advisors have never looked at all four together as one system. The prospect always does.
They search your name, often with "financial advisor" attached. Whatever owns page one owns the story, whether you chose it or not.
Your headline and About either restate the reason you were referred, or read like every other advisor's template.
Increasingly checked even in finance. Does the person here match the professional on LinkedIn, or are they two people?
The surface you fully control. That makes a generic or stale site the most expensive miss of the four.
Five things have to be true.
Run every surface through these. The audit prompt below scores each one for you, but read them first. They are the standard the whole tool is built on.
Build proof without testimonials.
Under the SEC Marketing Rule, testimonials and endorsements about advisory services are heavily restricted. So this audit builds proof a different way: your body of work, the consistency of showing up, credentials, third-party features and press, and educational content that shows how you think. Compliant proof is slower to build, which is precisely why it's a moat. Your competitors won't do the patient version. (Not legal advice. Confirm anything client-facing with your firm's compliance team before it goes live.)
Gather your surfaces.
Five minutes of collection makes the audit ten times sharper.
Run it on yourself.
Gather your surfaces with the checklist above, then paste everything into Claude (preferred) or your LLM of choice. Pass 01 scores you, names the single highest leverage fix, and builds you a branded report to download. Pass 02 rewrites your weakest surface. Run it in the same conversation so the model keeps the context.
You are a brand and presence auditor for financial advisors. For advisors, trust is the deciding factor, especially moving up market, and a referred prospect quietly verifies you across Google, LinkedIn, Instagram, and your website before the first call. You also understand U.S. compliance: under the SEC Marketing Rule, testimonials and endorsements are heavily restricted, so "proof" must never depend on client quotes about advisory services or performance. Be direct. I would rather hear it now than lose the client later. Here is everything a prospect would find when they look me up: - MY NAME: - WHAT I WANT TO BE KNOWN FOR (the reason someone refers me): - WHO I'M TRYING TO REACH (and whether I'm moving up market): - GOOGLE (titles/snippets for my name + "financial advisor"): - LINKEDIN (my headline + About): - INSTAGRAM (my bio + a description of my last 6 posts): - WEBSITE (my homepage headline + opening copy, or "none"): STEP 1. Audit me in writing, here in the chat, first. Score each dimension 1 to 10 with a one-line reason: 1. COHERENCE - same person on every surface? 2. DIFFERENTIATION - swap my name for any advisor's. Still true? Then I fail. 3. NARRATIVE CONTROL - do I own page one, or does the algorithm? 4. PROOF (COMPLIANT) - evidence without testimonials or performance. Flag anything resembling a client endorsement as a risk to remove. 5. THE SNIFF TEST - after 4 minutes, more confident or less? Then give me THE VERDICT (one paragraph, do I survive today?), THE ONE FIX (the single highest-leverage change, not a list), and COMPLIANCE FLAGS (you are not my compliance team, so flag it and tell me to confirm). STEP 2. Then build a branded report as a single downloadable HTML file titled "The Sniff Test," using only what is in the audit above. Include my name and the date, a composite score out of 50, the verdict, the five dimensions each with its score, a thin score bar, the one-line reason and a Next Step, a dark One Fix block, and the compliance flags with a short disclaimer. Style it: parchment background #FAF8F0, near-black ink #211D18, cognac accent #8C6840, display font Cormorant Garamond, body font Inter, square corners, hairline rules, small-caps labels, no em dashes. Add an @page Letter rule, print-color-adjust exact, break-inside avoid on each block, and a fixed "Save as PDF" button that prints cleanly and hides on print. STEP 3. If you can run code, also render that HTML to a true PDF with the fonts embedded and give it to me as a download, so the file looks identical for everyone. STEP 4. Also give me a plain, black-and-white, text-only version of the whole audit, no color or graphics, that prints on any printer and is easy to forward to a compliance reviewer. If you cannot create files, do all of STEP 1 as text, then paste the report HTML in a code block so I can save it myself, with the black-and-white version below it.
Using the audit you just ran, rewrite my weakest surface so it passes the sniff test.
My positioning: [paste your positioning statement - if you don't have one yet, run The Positioning Blueprint first, then come back].
Rewrite [ my LinkedIn About / my IG bio / my website headline ] so it:
- says the same thing as my other surfaces (coherence),
- could only be me - no line any advisor could claim (differentiation),
- makes the reason I'd be referred unmistakable in the first two lines,
- contains zero testimonials, performance claims, or specific product
recommendations (compliance),
- sounds like a person, not a brochure.
Give me two versions - one tighter, one warmer. Then tell me which you'd pick and why.
If the surfaces don't match, the leak is upstream.
When the audit says your presence is incoherent or undifferentiated, the instinct is to go fix the copy. Sometimes that's enough. Often it isn't, because there was never a single position for the surfaces to express. You can't make four surfaces say the same thing until you've decided what that thing is.
The two tools are a sequence: decide, then prove.
Pick the lane. Pressure-test it until it holds. The three-pass system that turns "I help people with their money" into a position only you can own.
Get the blueprintMake every surface say the one thing you committed to, and verify a referred prospect would trust you before the call.
You are hereThis won't build your reputation for you.
It tells you the truth about the one you already have, before a prospect does. The work of becoming someone worth referring is still yours. This just makes sure that when the referral comes, your presence confirms it instead of quietly talking the prospect out of the call.
Want me to run it with you?
Comment AUDIT on the post and I'll send the full Sniff Test (this page, the PDF, and both prompts) straight to your inbox. Or take it now.